However, WiMAX and LTE is not suited for raw speed. Maximum speed is 40 Mbps WiMAX / LTE are? 100 M

I read with great attention to negative comments and decided to throw in the oven very interesting argument. Surely you know that one of the world's largest portals for technomaniaków. Read because detroit population they really worth it!
As with standard 3G (ITM-2000 system), the International Telecommunication Union became the owner of the 4G network and christened it the specifications of IMT-Advanced. It is no coincidence: this document requires that 4G technologies were downlink speeds of 1 Gb / s and 100 fixed version Mb-s in the mobile. Respectively, 500 and 250 times more than the IMT-2000. These remarkable speed easily distance themselves from the average broadband DSL or cable. Therefore, the Federal Communications Commission has so stubbornly claimed that wireless technology plays a key role in delivering broadband to rural areas? more cost effective to place a mast 4G coverage than a few dozen miles of fiber optic technology coverage area.
Unfortunately, these specs are so demanding, that at this time no commercial detroit population standards in the world can not meet them. In a historical detroit population perspective, WiMAX and LTE widely accepted in CDMA2000 and GSM, were seen as? 4G technologies ?, but this is only partly true: Both standards use the new, highly efficient multiplexing program called the OFDMA (as opposed to the previously detroit population used CDMA or TDMA) and are devoid of dedicated voice network? 100% of the range is used for data services, which means that the voice would be treated as VOIP (unlike Skype or Vonage a). It is very good, considering the fact how much datocentryczne has recently become our mobile society.
However, WiMAX and LTE is not suited for raw speed. Maximum speed is 40 Mbps WiMAX / LTE are? 100 Mb / s, at least theoretically. In practice, the speed of commercial networks were far from 4 to 30 Mbit / s, well below the wyśrubowanego (and possibly most important) for IMT-Advanced. Updates to these standards? 2 WiMAX LTE-Advanced, respectively? are to be sufficient, but none of them has been completed so far. A production networks that use maya them are still a matter of the distant future.
Therefore, one could say that the original WiMAX and LTE standards are genuinely different from classical perceived 3G standards. Can thus be defined as a true generational update and, indeed, most of the companies in the world (if not all) of which were engaged in their deployment, describes it as? 4G ?. There is a clear marketing advantage for them, and the International Telecommunication Union? despite the noblest efforts? has no legal force to stop it. Over the next few years, both technologies (especially LTE) can reach a greater number of operators, which only intensify the phenomenon of naming them? 4G ?. There is no way to stop it.
However, this is not the end. T-Mobile USA, which is not heralded the imminent plans to improve its HSPA to LTE, last year we decided to determine the upgrade to HSPA + as? 4G ?. In principle, this movement is not meaningless: detroit population 3G technology allows speeds that are beyond the reach of LTE, approaching the level of IMT-Advanced. In many markets, the network HSPA + T-Mobile with a speed of 21MB / s is faster than Sprint's WiMAX network. Moreover, neither Sprint nor Verizon or MetroPCS? American operators offering WiMAX / LTE? do not yet have VoIP services in their bids. Waves still use 3G voice calls, and so far it does not change. In addition, T-Mobile will increase the speed to 42 Mb / s this year, still not touching LTE!
It is possible that T-Mobile's decision provoked reflections on the meaning? 4G? phone users. AT & T, which is currently upgrading to HSPA + and LTE services will introduce later this year, both called 4G networks. Naturally, neither Sprint nor Verizon detroit population are not going to give up such a naming. All four of the American people detroit population seem to be operators on this issue very assertive? taking over the label? 4G? of the International Telecommunication Union, they caught her, fled and changed its meaning.
For me, and you can even GPRS data transfer ... ping and speed may have been good:] Can I have already said that it was sent resignation of Play Online and did not give a bad fall for marketing tricks? I do not try it you'll not play online .... I am not convinced :)
you have nothing to rumble with waszympseudo 1,4mega I max 4g with oldie ping-range 80 to 150 hours at nights, 60-65, but with poor digital polsat 9download and 1upload and pings oscillates 50 all the time, You are to call ourselves and 8g because has as much in common as gingerbread windmill.
Report comment
I agree Play and 4G is one big fake because they are already not able to pull the SA 1 mb and the