However, within each country to achieve this goal have great difficulties, some countries may be be

Twenty-first free census records century, for the present the two most important environmental issue is climate free census records change (climate change) and oil top-feng (peak oil), the seriousness of these problems, the largest planet can sweep away human civilization empty, it must produce a minimum long-term, jeopardize the operation of the global political economy and society. Behind these two problems have one thing in common causes (of course, free census records not the source of all the problems) - the number of the population. Some people think that population is the result of excessive use of oil is, and why.
This article argues that predictions about climate change and oil depletion, indicating that, in some cases, to reduce the population is almost necessary and inevitable. The second part shows that there are innate bias for population growth on the existing system of domestic law, and international law, population issues are also difficult hotly improved. The third part shows that the EU is organized, whether democracy also have a population free census records bias problem. The fourth part shows the EU on environmental law has no available means of treatment.
Although the current environment remains highly optimistic for the EU, immediately began to further reduce the need of the population, are unlikely to really exist, but on the contrary, even if the need exists, and with the deterioration of the situation, also possible to control free census records the extent of the problem will not help the population, free census records and therefore strict population control measures, probably will not appear in the European Union. Moreover, the EU law is only a preliminary attempt to understand the author, it is not likely to have any meaningful analysis and recommendations. So, this little report only shows up, the system of democracy and freedom, whether domestic or international cooperation, we must face the global environmental free census records problems, there is a very great difficulty. Maintain justice under tremendous free census records pressure on resources democracy, perhaps after all individual, free census records complex political, legal issues inescapable background. First, how bad the situation might be?
Currently the most widely recognized global environmental crisis is climate change (climate change, this term has been generally replaced the original "global warming (global warming)," the term), and the current global coping, mainly proposed in the Kyoto Protocol, the European Union and to the scale of operation of the largest carbon trading market. [1] [2] Another addition to carbon trading, the current direction of the climate change process, free census records generally there is: [3]
We're still not sure how the effectiveness of carbon reduction, and whether you can avoid the very serious consequences. However, at least from the Kyoto Protocol, from 2000 to 2007 carbon emissions still continue to rise. [6] The EU's 2020 target, it can only be a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (this is relative to the baseline in 1990). However, even with respect to 80% of 1990 emissions, still may not be able to reduce greenhouse gases in the atmosphere continue to rise in proportion, this speculation is not, but perhaps it does not need much scientific theory. Since 1990 alone, 80% is still emissions in 1980, and since 1950 the world's greenhouse gases will continue to rise, why can consider staying in emissions in 1980, it is possible to stop climate change it?
The second problem although it is widely recognized, but no corresponding impact in general, such as climate change on international policy, this problem is known as the oil top-feng (peak oil). But in addition to oil, all non-renewable natural resource has a value close to the front (peak) problem. Oil the top front of the problem initially free census records predicted by the theory free census records of American geologist M. King Hubbert made, the basic way of analysis is considered, the amount of oil produced each year in the development of the calendar year, will be presented roughly normal distribution, which is due to start there are many easy to find and easy oil, and in response to the needs of production will continue to increase until the reserves and the oil fields have been found capable of newly discovered insufficient response to rising demand, then the production of oil on to the front value. Feng can reach values represent low-cost recoverable oil has been inadequate, and therefore the supply of oil will gradually decline. Hubbert's original model, the downward trend would be similar upward free census records trend, trend following graph.
And this model also appear on the production free census records of various oil-producing countries in the world, some countries have been identified to the peak value (such as the U.S., UK, Norway), and some of the information is not necessarily reliable, while others have yet to reach the peak value. But because oil is a finite resource, Feng values will be to basically, the only question is when to. The theoretical value of Feng also used in other non-renewable natural resources, free census records such as natural gas, coal and even uranium peak value estimates there are people who make these estimates are obviously very pessimistic forecast of natural gas in 2020 will reach peak value, coal will reach peak value in 2150, reached peak value of uranium in 2035.
The problem is that the oil and gas is difficult to replace the function of many, in addition to electricity generation, sea, land and air transportation are highly dependent on oil, which would make highly dependent on the international flow of goods transport free census records is affected, free census records and because of the current agricultural production, fertilizers, pesticides and farm machinery is essential, and fertilizer and pesticides free census records are petroleum and natural gas products, and the use of fossil free census records fuels, mainly agricultural, the result is that the food is completely free census records unable to make up the shortage may occur.
Of course, whether it is the problem of climate change, or 石油锋 values have not have serious consequences, and these problems when it will happen, whether we have the means to deal with, and some may have expected the Department, however, assume that the problem really happen in 40 years or 50 years, free census records we have now with powerful means to increase social, political, economic and technical resilience 40 years later, when the possible exception of the development of renewable energy and reduce carbon emissions so as a foreign individual, further control the population, it will become necessary as.
The basic meaning of this formula is that the environmental impact is equal to population multiplied by affluence (measured in consumption, free census records and in the overall economy can be used to estimate the per capita GDP) multiplied by the degree of environmental damage production technologies. [7] This equation has been a lot of criticism, but basically still is a powerful estimating tool. While a similar manner can be used to estimate the consumption of carbon and oil. This formula reminds us of the population is always important, but even if not traditional environmental policy free census records matters, free census records such as the development of renewable energy, improve energy efficiency, the development of new technology and so on, even if there is no breakthrough in the development of technology, simply reducing population it is possible to effectively reduce the environmental impact of humans. When technological breakthroughs difficult to expect, population control on carbon emissions as well as in response to the oil crisis of the most effective means.
Population control in two ways: birth control and control death. However, the control is not a viable way of death, no matter what kind of ethics free census records in the position of basically killing is wrong, and that it is impossible to democratic rule in the country to protect the rights of compatibility to the death to reach a large-scale population control control, it is difficult free census records not to be in the form of the Holocaust. The only remaining means of birth control, birth control but also involves the intervention of the rights of the people, even some controls can not be allowed in the country democratic free census records rule of law.
2) the effect of birth control will take some time to appear, this is due to the inertia of the population (population momentum) free census records [8], even the "one-child" within a certain period of the total population is still increasing. However, if you have a lot to reduce the human impact on the environment in 50 years, now we must strive to reduce the birth rate. However, due to the inertia of the population problem will not show up immediately in our "there" often do not notice free census records if we do not birth control, then will have no control over when the population of 50 years.
However, within each country to achieve this goal have great difficulties, some countries may be because free census records the population structure and human strengths, unwilling to control the population, in addition, free census records immigration is an important issue in many countries in Europe, immigration is a major factor in population growth. Although the global issues on immigration did not increase the population of the world, however, may have some incentive not conducive to population control. free census records (On the EU, even if the birth control in the EU reached an agreement, if let free immigration countries outside the EU, it may not have control of the country's population but can influence in the countries through immigration expanded.) In short, if the situation worse to must control the population, is likely to involve birth control and the need for a global agreement free census records to regulate immigration, and to be able to implement such a global free census records agreement within countries - and this is a big challenge for democracy is. Second, the political system of the population bias ethicists David Benatar on fertility problems and take an extreme position, free census records his basic proposition is "constant fertility is being born intelligent beings of significant harm, and therefore morally Error. " [9] Here I do not intend to go directly free census records to support or oppose this radical stance, but Benatar sorting out the anti-fertility must stand against very strong free census records "growth bias," which comes from the evolution of reproductive prejudice, social pressure Government policy and operational logic regime itself.
Bias in the operation of the government, the main problem of population structure, this is common sense among many countries. Even the country's population has been very much, however, must remain close to the same rate of substitution, as much if not the same (or more) people replace the already aging and retired people work and pay taxes, the government will be unable to maintain Very many (not only social welfare) operation. [10]
Because democracy is basically a majority decision as the main decision-making mechanism, which means