On the ideological spectrum, acceptance of premarital sex, cohabitation, extramarital childbearing,

Taiwan Research on cohabitation (cohabitation) is minimal. Cohabitation is the last thing people can not see today, although not necessarily to hide, but it will not be disclosed to the public with great fanfare: "! We lived together," a friend tacit majority status, parents socioeconomic are an eye, close one eye, catch the opportunity to nag to get married. Life experience tells us that the number of cohabiting around seems more and more, but it seems not too concerned about the social issues, because cohabitation is basically living arrangements for two people, neither cause environmental pollution, does not affect socioeconomic the economic development (at least So on the surface). But when "equity partner in Taiwan to promote socioeconomic the Alliance" (companion AU) proposed "multi-married" proposition outside of marriage and the family in the form of blood began to be composed of attention. Couples League is based on the perspective of human rights socioeconomic concern socioeconomic and raised a family of diverse ideas, and now I want from a number socioeconomic of angles is to discuss the issue. socioeconomic
How many persons live together in Taiwan? It depends on how to define cohabitation. If universities and graduate male, girlfriend live together can be considered, then I am afraid there is now a million! I've used the 2000 census the number of Taiwan cohabitation estimates obtained data about 32 million people. I'm in the annual meeting of the Population Association reported the results, all participants shook his head, mocking young scholars say too little, too much, said a senior scholar frown. I am glad to hear both sides of the reaction, since the old, small diametrically opposed views, and that this data should be some reference value. Recently I took 2010 census report estimates once again in the same way, the number is 760,000 cohabitation. I simply say what estimation method.
No dynamic history of cohabitation investigations static 'relationship with the head of household "survey nor the title" cohabitants "option. In the general survey, the "cohabitation" word only appears on "marital status" issues, but because of those who are willing to consider cohabitation answer truthfully, none of the survey will be listed separately cohabitation, but with "Married" into "Married or cohabiting." Though this design can not get directly from the survey data cohabitation, but may be able to improve the chances socioeconomic of cohabitants answer truthfully, if supplemented by household registration information, it can be estimated number of cohabitation. Marital status of the census of four categories: Single, Married or cohabiting, socioeconomic divorced or separated, widowed. Marital status of the household registration socioeconomic information is also four categories: Single, Married, Divorced, Widowed. If the census, when cohabiting respondents are truly to notice that two sets of data subtraction, socioeconomic not only can be estimated the total number of cohabiting (census Married or cohabiting, minus the household registration has even), you can know cohabitants marital status is unmarried, divorced or widowed. "Truthful reporting" this assumption may be too strong, I have tried other estimation methods, directly into every household in the tag may cohabitants, but behind this method is more complicated, not to mention our first skipped. socioeconomic
Table 1 is a 2010 census resident population and marital status gap between household registration population and the number of cohabiting year 2010 and 2000 estimates. First look at the part of the 2010's, cohabitants marital status to unmarried Up; divorced or separated slightly lower, the proportion is quite high; widowed minimum number, but not trace. From the age distribution, the maximum number of cohabiting women 30-39 and 40-49 age group, and were nearly 10 million people, followed by the 50-59 age group who number nearly socioeconomic 90,000. These results show that young unmarried cohabitation is not exclusive living arrangements, the young population, the divorced and widowed cohabitation is the main population. In the same way the estimated number of people living together in 2000 to 32 million, a substantial increase in cohabitation between the number of years in each age group, an increase of about doubled.
Figure 1 aged 20-34 who have dual rate and the rate of cohabitation Description: Taiwan 2010 data for the 2000 data, Germany, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands for the 2001 data for the 2006 data, Norway, France, for the 2007 data . Source: Taiwan part of the estimated value of this article, socioeconomic other countries from the OECD Family Database www.oecd.org socioeconomic / els / social / family / database (Last updated 01/07/2010) choose cohabitation over the reasons, though generally considered marital cohabitation can maintain more stable relations between the sexes, but marriage would threaten the stability of certain aspects of the individual, socioeconomic including career socioeconomic development, friendships, interests, interact socioeconomic with native socioeconomic families and so on. Because marriage more emphasis put together two consistent and action, so the cost of divorce socioeconomic is higher than the cost of termination of cohabitation, at least for women so that they change socioeconomic more often because of marital lifestyle. So long stable intimate relationships may belong to the youth segment needs must also be maintained in order to more mature stage, Sweden, Australia, the U.S. data showed delayed marriage and divorce rates were those of an earlier marriage divorce rate. Therefore be regarded as personal socioeconomic secure a stable cohabitation marriage socioeconomic temporary measures may be testing their marriage life, it may be looking to extend marriage. socioeconomic
Another consideration is the project's economics. Living together can save personal spending in terms of durable goods, although whether cohabitation or marriage socioeconomic can be, but the social implications of marriage and cohabitation of different makes can expand credit married and has two sides marital relationship than just cohabitation The two sides are more willing to co-management and sharing of property. Therefore, one or more resource socioeconomic demand socioeconomic more resources for cohabitation or marriage party considerations will be different. Sweden, Finland, Norway, the United States, Canada, the data show: the higher the level of education who (resulting higher), greater benefits can be obtained from the marital relationship, but also tend to cohabit rather than marry.
Attitude change is a prelude to behavior change, but also because the formation of attitudes tend to change other people's behavior comes, late marriage age of the previous generation who also married the next generation of its high number of children on the lesser generation of its next-generation fertility also lower the divorce rate in its next generation of divorce is higher. In a mutual cycle chain, Wilhelm's socioeconomic with a six 's leftist social movements 七 as a starting point: leftist militants during a collision conservatism, while bringing premarital cohabitation and other relationships with behaviors that are still just beginning is regarded as deviant behavior, but thanks to the support of certain social elite, are slowly developing a regional sub-culture (such as high prevalence of political socioeconomic participation on campus) is, and thereafter gradually spread to a new generation who has become socially acceptable lifestyle.
On the ideological spectrum, acceptance of premarital sex, cohabitation, extramarital childbearing, socioeconomic as well as the division of household chores, such as gender equality attitudes are biased to the left of liberalism, and conservatism is more emphasis on the right of the sanctity of marriage and the traditional division of housework. The higher the probability of participation in religious activities were more inclined to conservatism, choose cohabitation is low, so the EU countries, Australia and the United States as well. Conservative or religious association with radical ideas, education equally. In general, the higher the education level the more likely liberal ideology, should more able to accept cohabitation, higher the probability of cohabitation, but we pointed out in the discussion socioeconomic of time and economic factors: the higher the education level, socioeconomic the higher socioeconomic the proceeds, the more inclined to choose married. Obviously this level of education are too many important variables associated attributes, making its relationship with the marriage act not as religious, almost identical results were obtained socioeconomic in all countries. Scholars socioeconomic compare the relationship between educational attainment and cohabitation of the European countries, found that the impact of education on cohabitation seems to have two effects, the low education level of economic disadvantage because it is a high probability of cohabitation, who led a high level of education collision traditional thinking, the probability of cohabitation also higher, while the middle level of education directly highest probability of marriage. establish intimate relationships change the way: from marriage socioeconomic to cohabitation cohabitation replacing marriage socioeconomic to reflect changes in the way the sexes establishment socioeconomic of intimacy, Sweden is a pioneer of this change. socioeconomic Hoem and Hoem the development process in Sweden is divided into four stages: the beginning of cohabitation is seen as a deviation or edgy behavior is a minority activity, socioeconomic most people married directly; second stage, cohabitation is regarded prelude to marriage, to test each other's commitment, most of the cohabitants do not have children; third stage, the social acceptance of cohabitation as marriage generally socioeconomic another "distortion" in the stage of having children who cohabit Yulai The more; Finally, social cohabitation and marriage for exactly the same views, cohabitants and married no difference in the level of fertility. If the analysis based on the development of this framework of EU countries, Greece, Italy and Spain are currently in the first phase, socioeconomic a low rate of cohabitation; Netherlands, socioeconomic Switzerland, West Germany in the second stage, although the rate of cohabitation is high, but the fertility and more occurred in the marriage; countries in the third phase are Austria, the United Kingdom and Ireland; while Denmark and Sweden have reached the fourth stage, France and East Germany are close behind, between third and fourth stage . These developments involve different socioeconomic view of how social cohabitation and marriage.
Original marriage covenant is regarded as sacrosanct, she is the family of God in order to ensure lasting and create: socioeconomic "So God paired, people can not separate from it" (Matthew Chapter XIX Section VI); seventeen end of the century, marriage in the gradual loss of the sanctity of religion, to the late eighteenth century, Protestants socioeconomic have been able to obtain the right to marry in a civil court in front of non-religious socioeconomic officials, while France's 1791 award given to promote the spirit of the Constitution even this one To all citizens, regardless of their religious beliefs are. In other words, the legal marriage as a civil contract, to regulate the relationship between the sexes sexual life, property, and child support obligations. Now that removal of the sanctity of marriage, the cohabitation may reduce accountability is the corresponding law also began to focus on the relationship between sex cohabitants, property, and child support obligations.
Today in Sweden, Finland and Denmark and other countries, cohabitation and marriage in the law almost completely enjoy equal status, whether to end the relationship after the division of property, alimony or child custody, have the same specifications and divorce, socioeconomic and even there "cohabitation Certificate" design, although most rarely used. In France, for three years after marriage, premarital cohabitation is also considered marriage. In the UK, the biological father of the rights and obligations of legitimate children and illegitimate children the same. Comprehensive review of family law changes related to the Western countries, the general trend is to standardize the form of marriage and divorce less and less, but the interests socioeconomic of their children and property management allocation norms are more and more. However, Spain and Italy are not the same development, traditionally has been to get married socioeconomic young will leave their parents home, making the chance of cohabitation is very low, but significant religious activities socioeconomic into daily life, but also makes a smaller acceptance of cohabitation , plus the provision of social welfare come from families with non-Western countries such as the Nordic countries as much from cohabitation can get help from the family less than marriage, and therefore postpone marriage age gradually, while cohabitation has not followed rise.
In China, though not a necessary condition for marriage fertility, but it is an important condition for fertility, extramarital childbearing must bear considerable social pressure, not many actors actually taken, so if cohabitation can not be the same as the northern and western Europe in Taiwan, produces and Married same or close to the fertility rate, but also to meet the needs and cohabiting couples living together, will make the urgency of reducing the marriage; so if cohabitation increasingly prevalent, would be detrimental to fertility stabilized or picked up, how to make Birth and marriage off the hook, so that more and more comfortable cohabitant can ease childbirth is an important coping direction, which went back to the front of a subject - "cohabitants socioeconomic and regulations to protect the rights and obligations" on, apparently it was is a drastic way.
2014/01/06 at 15:16
Sparse floor, said:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. (Log Out / Change)
FB Lane Aberdeen mouth sociology latest articles citizen of the road, thorns: Sociology expose people to let you know that things do not want to use my health to change your security? Vaccine development in the history of Vietnam and Taiwan sovereignty dispute socioeconomic under the guise of class conflict is the main reason is just the ignorance of sociology, is a reflection of Taiwan society without a sense of injustice Vietnamese workers riot class and the China factor has published articles in June 2014 ( 2) May 2014 (9) April 2014 (9) March 2014 (6) February socioeconomic 2014 (3) January 2014 (4) December 2013 (5) November 2013 (5) October 2013 (5) September 2013 (5) August 2013 (4) July 2013 (5) June 2013 (5) May 2013 (5) April 2013 ( 5) March 2013 (4) February 2013 (2)
STS Chinese citizens civil society Population Health comrades national labor justice nationalist student movement of domestic violence professional local political union Brazilian Sex Pingtung gender roles assigned to resist domination proceeds of terrorism and political education of ethnic Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture Methods colonial historical sociology of nuclear power motherhood democratic nationalist democratization of consumption disaster patriarchal criminal stigma Eco disease research and production technology community social innovation and social movement of economic migrants racist Internet space character design years Creek Tibet Vietnam Tourism Planning Body urban political class masculinity medical disorders Disorders Weber Marx Blogroll 17SUPPORT together to help Guava anthropology Visitors 1,448,495 people text search of all articles in the Search for:
Article not sent - please confirm your Email Location
% D bloggers like this: