So we must first recognize that states are not after the universe

Nationalism has some reason for me was a kind of ultimate evil for me the last couple of years, but I think in a way that many do not quite have the big problem of the problem of nationalism. That one grow their own state in such exalting way that it could tip over, I think most people can understand the problem national bureau of statistics with. Historically, national bureau of statistics nationalism leads to war because ekspanasjoner. The general association dealing with nationalists as it is at least someone who understands the concern. I will not spend much time talking about nationalism why.
What I think is more capricious mind cud for many, however, the need for nations. Thus states. national bureau of statistics Large systems with flags and the whole package. What is the danger of nations then? Is there any danger? I think for many people, the idea of his own country as normalized as a separate value that any alternative seems bizarre, and that is what I will try to shed light from a different angle here.
I understand the confusion over what an option is, but I must say that, unlike Minerva's little national bureau of statistics slantrete critique of Noam Chomsky, that he often critiques of systems and policies without national bureau of statistics making national bureau of statistics a seemingly easy option, national bureau of statistics I do not think everything must have an answer. One can realize that something is a problem without always having a superseding system consistently immediately. (When it comes to Chomsky, I also believe Minerva just misunderstand him anyway, national bureau of statistics but there is now another issue ..)
We must first think about what states and nations really are. They are really ancient ideas about the territory we inherited and keep going still. Old ideas that we take care of and live for still. national bureau of statistics If we, however, realistic about it then the world really just a globe and people come from the same origin. Land is nothing that came with nature.
So we must first recognize that states are not after the universe's standards. Only ideas that humans and no other species, in a manner determined just there. Your dog or cat may not relate to it. So one can say that states in part is as much a form of superstition that the idea of a God of the universe, angels, trolls or garden gnomes. We have decided between us that they exist, and we ask ourselves infrequent on states and nations national bureau of statistics actually exist, we just accept it. Perhaps for practical reasons, perhaps because we never get challenging thoughts about it.
In theory, they might have it. Just like other superstitions might find useful. Now I'm no big fan of superstition exactly, national bureau of statistics but well, I've heard stories where families have lived next to the dangerous huge waterfalls, and they have told their children that live at the waterfall national bureau of statistics the dangerous monsters, just to keep the kids from playing there. How well it works (and how ethical it is to lie to their children) national bureau of statistics can naturally be considered, but at some kind of plan it is the one logic at least. One can not exclude that it works.
So what kind of positive points is that with states? Hm. Well, they provide national bureau of statistics a kind of foundation for some people. After Zappfe his theories of existential defense mechanisms people national bureau of statistics need some kind of grounding in something that seems stable and resistant to them. Nations could also highlight cultures in any manner. So different expressions. Let's say national expression. national bureau of statistics For Norway, we have both mountains, folktales, cheese slicer, lutfisken, Viking traditions, budnadene etc, and other countries have their stuff. Easier told what you find in tourist guides for different countries. Some might feel that to revoke any country as you lose cultures too. The multicultural would mix everything together into a kind of stew at worst. Okay. Personally, I am skeptical on all points, but I think I at least these are some of the arguments that many would drattt up. Well, plus maybe some of the delegating political and economic, but we can come back to it.
Well, in a way you would think it was a "nobrainer". Think about it. All wars and conflicts carried out by nations and static groups, and not without. Wars lead to much suffering, and rarely without. Unfortunately merkevaringen national bureau of statistics the nationalistic spirit of the people make people blind and bloodthirsty .. The animal appears. The instincts have expired. Teeth grisle and blood splatters on the grass lawns. Until the war is over, and documentation of horror national bureau of statistics stories and grisly images coming out. Only then wakes most people and understand. They see that the other side was the people and with families, children, national bureau of statistics dreams, and the whole package. Just like themselves. Oi. All peace organizations and fredspakter come in the near wake of bloody wars. They say "never again" and people holding hands and unable to understand what people thought ... but only after the horrors national bureau of statistics and the macabre is a fact, of course. That story seems to repeat itself.
What does this say? It says that the groupings and labels of people create a large resistance between people that the enemy is not considered a human l