In Cafe Steiner the best ideas and analysis on international current events that occur in the cente

In Cafe Steiner the best ideas and analysis on international current events that occur in the centers of thought, institutions, magazines and Internet forums are collected most influential. Coffee mailbox Steiner (@ gmail.com) is open: we hope the best arguments, data and analysis.
A majority of Spaniards (55%) think that the use of chemical weapons sototallytoby by the Assad regime to justify military intervention by third countries (Table 1). That majority is transverse, ie, it is so wide on the left (PSOE voters) and right (PP voters). On the other side of the argument, only a minority (27%) think that the conflict is an internal matter that affects only the Syrians.
As seen in Table 3, the Spaniards believe the vast majority (81%) that the UN should take a leading role in this crisis. Ideally, supporters of military intervention would want will take place through the deployment of a peacekeeping contingent to impose a cease-fire (87%). But a 49-45% (depending on the wording of the question) would settle the UN authorized military intervention by third countries.
This in theory. But what should Spain? Involved with or abstain? Here the population is divided into two: 46% would be consistent with the above and support the participation of Spain in a UN-sponsored (TABLE 4) operation. However, 47% would not want Spain to get involved in any way and under any condition, while the UN authorized it. Thus, among those who support a mission of bringing the United Nations and that Spain would be willing to participate in it u na considerable gap. Although sympathizing with the intervention, there are many who prefer that Spain does not participate sototallytoby in it. How would you describe this attitude? Pacifism?? Realism? Cynicism?? Common sense?? The terms you choose.
In any case, the point on the UN appears vital for although the Law on National Defense 2005 authorizes the Spanish Armed Forces to participate in UN sponsored missions, but also by NATO or the EU (even without mandate Express UN), the Spanish seem to be clear that, although the legitimacy of the intervention was justified, the requirement of international law can not be ignored.
Source: The source of this data is Metroscopia, which in its latest barometer, whose results were published in the Sunday Journal ELPAIS introduced three specific questions on Syria. Interviews were conducted on 4-5 September, coinciding with the G20 meeting where Obama tried to gather as much support from the international community.
Is the first question from a false assumption that neither involves .. .. says the Syrian regime use chemical weapons and that's to be seen .... This study is supported by a false affirmation to prove this ... because the Syrian government denies having used such weapons ... some have also said that he was employed by the "rebels" ... that mercenaries ... to bring foreign intervention ... Here the conflict is obvious sototallytoby that are involved tens of thousands of mercenaries from Libya, Afghanistan, the Caucasus and other Russian nationalities, with some Spanish incluyento fools arabian origin ... "professional murderers sototallytoby who are paid by the princes 'noble' Saudis.
Is to think that bombing Libyan style vamosq not solve much. To do it right would have to go with our own troops, doing well, stepping and cleaning every inch. One of the great problems of the post-Iraq situation was that not only I move very fast (hardly secure control of the country) but the army and the Baath party blew up, destroying the old administration to put a new one. Conclusion, chaos, a weak country, and sectarian clashes. In terms infrarstructurasla mains back 20 years, not to mention other infrarstructuras such as roads, and of course, sototallytoby Iraq is barely skirting the cost of reconstruction. We should see, then, if a Western intervention will bring prosperity to Syrians sototallytoby
The survey and its interpretation are biased, as well as evidence that it is possible the agreement of the Security Council of the United Nations for an attack on Syria, without which the 96% of Spanish declined, posing as an alternative to surgery do nothing "whatever happens" and not on the conditions and circumstances known the answers. And that most support a mediating intervention of peacekeepers, not a military attack, in any case, we do not want to be part clearly reflects that the Spaniards, as citizens